This domain serves as a reference point for examining who holds authority, control, and decision-making power over biometric identifiers.
Biometric sovereignty is implicated whenever physical or behavioral traits such as faces, fingerprints, voices, irises, or movement patterns are used as access keys, identity anchors, or verification mechanisms.
Unlike passwords or credentials, biometric identifiers are persistent and cannot be revoked or replaced once compromised.
This site does not argue for policy positions, rights frameworks, or regulatory solutions.
Its purpose is to name a structural condition that already operates across security systems, identity infrastructures, and administrative processes — often normalized as convenience or efficiency.
This page is intentionally minimal.
It exists to ensure the term Biometric Sovereignty has a stable place to stand.
本網域作為一個參考標記，用於檢視：誰掌握生物特徵識別碼的權威、控制與決策權。
只要臉部、指紋、聲音、虹膜、步態或行為模式等身體與行為特徵 被用作存取鑰匙、身分錨點或驗證機制， 「生物特徵主權」問題便已被牽動。
與密碼或一般憑證不同，生物特徵識別碼具有持久性； 一旦外洩或遭到濫用，往往無法撤銷，也無法真正更換。
本站不主張政策立場、權利框架或監管解方。
它的目的，是為一種已在安全系統、身分基礎設施與行政流程中運作的結構性狀態命名—— 而這種狀態常被包裝為便利或效率，因而被日常化、被忽略。
本頁刻意維持極簡。
它存在，是為了確保 生物特徵主權（Biometric Sovereignty） 這個詞有一個穩定的立足點。